actors, movies

Manchurian Candidate 1962 vs. 2004

The original 1962 film, The Manchurian Candidate, was a U.S. Cold War political thriller and starred Angela Lansbury, Frank Sinatra, Janet Leigh, and Laurence Harvey. The remake of this classic substituted a Korean War veteran with a Gulf War veteran and gave it a modern twist. Directed by Jonathan Demme, it included an all-star cast with Denzel Washington, Meryl Streep, Liev Schreiber, and Jon Voight. Which version do you prefer?

514GE8H825L the-manchurian-candidate

The plots are similar. The acting in both are top rate. The conspiracy, brainwashing, and greedy shenanigans seemed relevant in the Cold War classic as in the modern version.

The Confusion


Frank Sinatra as Ben Marco

“Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.”

Manchurian Candidate, The

Denzel Washington as Ben Marco

“Somebody got into our heads with big steel-toe boots, cable cutters and a chainsaw and they went to town. Neurons got got exposed and circuits got rewired. Our brain cells got obliterated, Raymond.”

The Mothers


Angela Lansbury, Mrs. Iselin

“Why don’t you pass the time by playing a little solitaire?”


Meryl Streep as Mrs. Eleanor Shaw

“Is this Captain Marco? Captain Bennet Marco? Bennet Ezekiel Marco? Listen.”

The Brainwashing



The Assassins

images  tumblr_mddx5nXql71rtsfqgo1_500

The Women


Janet Leigh falls for Ben Marco


Vera Farmiga as Shaw’s only love

The Creepy Kiss

the-manchurian-candidate 2


My vote? I think Angela Lansbury’s performance was so cold and evil, it bested Meryl Streep. Liev Scheiber was a fantastic Raymond Shaw, and Denzel Washington and Frank Sinatra’s performance was a draw, but what do you think?

23 thoughts on “Manchurian Candidate 1962 vs. 2004”

  1. Hi Cindy! I have only seen the remake so I can’t say which one I prefer. The thing is, I’m not all that interested in the subject matter so I don’t know if I’ll see the 1962 movie.


    1. I like the 1962 version because of the actors. I like conspiracy thriller movies, and this one is exceptional. Like you, there are genres that don’t grab me. For example, I’m done with slasher/horror movies. I’d like to think I’ve outgrown them. But thrillers and action? Love them. Horrific topics like the Holocaust? I’ve seen most. Westerns? I like a few of them, but not many sustain my interest. 🙂


  2. I really enjoyed both versions. I think that the remake was a good update with an outstanding cast. Their performances made the movie probably as good as the original. You couldn’t have asked for a better remake in my opinion. Nice post Cindy!


  3. Unfortunately the TIME that a movie is released can vitally impact it’s importance. The political climate, the ideas that were revolutionary at that moment – which we are not privy too now. If a remake can update such concepts to modern concerns and reality then there is something to be said. Otherwise it’s just a good story retold. Which is OK.
    I like Denzel, but I liked the original better.


  4. Hi, Cindy:

    It is my personal belief that certain films stand above the strata and should not be re-made, re-imagined, or in any way messed with.

    ‘The Manchurian Candidate’ stands high on that list. Due to it being very much of and in that time.
    B&W cinematography, Sinatra, Laurence Harvey, Angela Lansbury, Janet Leigh, James Gregory and all. Frankenheimer hit a chord with this ensemble that has yet to be duplicated.

    Liev Schreiber comes closest to Laurence Harvey’s inscruitible face and mannerisms. While Mr. Washington comes nowhere close to Sinatra’s Marco. And no one can touch Angela Lansbury as the politically striving Red Queen!

    In other words: “Close, but no cigar!”


    1. As usual, I appreciate your comments and agree with you. I try to look at films much the same way I read the novel and when I see the film version, I separate the two as two distinct texts. I liked very much the 2004 version of Manchurian Candidate in its own right. However, like you, the original is on a different level. Except for Schreiber. He was outstanding. Thanks, Jack!


    1. No kidding! You think of her from “Murder She Wrote” which is okay, but not my cup of tea. But I remember her in the Broadway version of Sweeney Todd and she was great. That film was chilling.


  5. I actually watched the 1962 version in 2004. Ironic! don’t you think. And the latter version I never got a chance to watch. But I do love the Black & White classic with Angela Lansbury. She was superb. And I’ve seen her in negative roles before as well. My favourite noir flick, Gaslight (1944), for instance, had her play a nasty maid. But I do generally like Meryl Streep as well as an actress.
    And I agree with your comment on separating books from movies. If a movie is bad, that’s ’cause it’s a bad adaptation, not ’cause it’s based on a book. There are plenty of cases where I love both books and their celluloid versions.


    1. Well, hello there, Nuances in films! Clever name.:)
      So glad you dropped by and commented. I forgot about Lansbury in Gaslight. Did you ever hear in Sondheim’s musical SweeneyTodd? She’s more known for her singing roles than acting. Anyway, I would recommend the newer version of MC. It’s very well done and acted well, too. Still, the classic is amazing. 🙂


      1. Ha!! Ha!! Actually my name happens to be Nuwan Sen (Thus my film critiques are written under the byline ‘Nuwan Sen’s Film Sense’). From there comes ‘nuwansenfilmsen’ (and my blog is ‘No Nonsense with Nuwan Sen’); but Nuances in Films is good idea! Ha! At least blog name has a similar meaning.
        Yes, I’d like to chk out the newer MC, if I get a chance.
        Thanks for following my blog.


  6. Watched 2004 version first then the 1962. Both good, with strong differences. 1962 version, foreign kidnapping-influence of solders vs 2004 version was US political kidnapping-influence. 1962 : The shooter killer of US politician and daughter-wife of Medal of Honor receipient-aspiring politician was Soldier(Medal of Honor) then comitted suicide.
    2005 : A politician & daughter-estranged girlfriend of Soldier, were drowned by the Soldier The kidnapped US Army Sargent-Colonel shot n killed the Medal of Honor receipient-political candidate & his Mother. The US Army Colonel was (justly)-falsey cleared by Gov. persons and charged a third party.


I ♥ comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s